International Current Affairs (#BidenIn)

[theseeker]

12 minutes ago, StringerBellend said:

so you made it up?

In the same you had two assertions 99.9%...Don’t care about robo debt and this, neither of which you can back up 

When sonar (I think it was) gave you evidence supporting his position you resorted to insults 

this is now in the what I refer to as “The Car Door Zone” 

your common sense is just snobbery 

although does reveal the liberal mind set, if the policy doesn’t directly benefit me In $ terms I’m not interested 

 

Oh no he's here again !

I worry you don't I.

Look I think you are suffering political PTSD after Shorten lost the election that couldn't be lost.

Because I'm a nice guy and have no hard feeling I'll give you a bit of free advice. IGNORE MY POSTS and you'll be a lot happier.

[StringerBellend]

2 hours ago, theseeker said:

Oh no he's here again !

I worry you don't I.

Look I think you are suffering political PTSD after Shorten lost the election that couldn't be lost.

Because I'm a nice guy and have no hard feeling I'll give you a bit of free advice. IGNORE MY POSTS and you'll be a lot happier.

Yes you do Judith

[StringerBellend]

3 hours ago, theseeker said:

Did you notice the word " most" in my post ? You have to read things more carefully before diving in.

Most would be Labor supporters for certain and common sense would tell you that given the unemployment patterns in Labor electorates.

Even with "most" stastics don't back your view up

https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/who-is-on-welfare-payments-in-australia/11347070

That took me a whole 2 minutes of google..

Ok I couldn't find a breakdown by electoral area, but to use your "common sense", the bulk of benefits go to pensioners, who not necissarily rusted on Labor voters. Robo-debt is not just chasing newstart recipients.

To the car door 

I can waste my time finding data to disprove your assertion that is based on nothing other than your snobbery and need to be an edgy internet alt-right warrior

But we both know that if I gave you an exact breakdown of welfare benefits by voting patterns you'd just call me a wanker and deflect

 

 

 

[StringerBellend]

On 29/06/2020 at 11:37 PM, wendybr said:

Lol.... I'll be forced to go find some Jordan Peterson, Jonathan Pie or someone else " objectionable" to articulate how dodgy banning opposing ideas is. 

I'm not saying our friend, The Seeker,  isn't having fun trolling, but honestly, a group of people nodding in agreement at the ideas they all share is boring, and poses no intellectual challenge at all.

Having some debate here promotes interactions. It should not be shut down as would happen if we stopped "putting up" with some who raises a different point of view.

 

He doesn't though does he?? when presented by facts and research, he then resorts to personal abuse. 

It's not opposing ideas or different point of views that I have a problem with or would seek to ban. But I'm (as you may have noticed) happy to debate, but throwing out a totally made up opinion and passing it off as 'fact' but then resorting to abuse and deflection isn't an intellectual challenge and it ain't debate.

He doesn't worry me, but the loss of the community does.

Make WSF Great Again!

 

[Cynth]

5 hours ago, theseeker said:

Did you notice the word " most" in my post ? You have to read things more carefully before diving in.

Most would be Labor supporters for certain and common sense would tell you that given the unemployment patterns in Labor electorates.

It’s so cute how ignorant your statements are. You can’t simultaneously claim lefties are champagne socialists and the unemployed at the same time. Here is some information, not that it will sober you. The first line is all you need to read! 
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2019/may/22/the-eight-charts-that-help-explain-why-the-coalition-won-the-2019-australian-election

Edited July 1, 2020 by Cynth

[Cynth]

3 minutes ago, Cynth said:

It’s so cute how ignorant your statements are. You can’t simultaneously claim lefties are champagne socialists and the unemployed at the same time. Here is some information, not that it will sober you. The first line is all you need to read! 
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2019/may/22/the-eight-charts-that-help-explain-why-the-coalition-won-the-2019-australian-election

Oh and I already know the response will be “but it’s the Guardian.......” Wah wah. 

[StringerBellend]

2 hours ago, Cynth said:

It’s so cute how ignorant your statements are. You can’t simultaneously claim lefties are champagne socialists and the unemployed at the same time. Here is some information, not that it will sober you. The first line is all you need to read! 
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2019/may/22/the-eight-charts-that-help-explain-why-the-coalition-won-the-2019-australian-election

It's the Fake News Lamestream media

 

[theseeker]

5 hours ago, StringerBellend said:

He doesn't though does he?? when presented by facts and research, he then resorts to personal abuse. 

It's not opposing ideas or different point of views that I have a problem with or would seek to ban. But I'm (as you may have noticed) happy to debate, but throwing out a totally made up opinion and passing it off as 'fact' but then resorting to abuse and deflection isn't an intellectual challenge and it ain't debate.

He doesn't worry me, but the loss of the community does.

Make WSF Great Again!

 

By the way , I never insulted Sonar or for that matter Radar or anybody. I would call it " strongly disagreed".

And Cynth , I think you mean chardonnay socialist not champagne socialist. But then again you might be higher in the socialist caste system ! 

Edited July 1, 2020 by theseeker

[Carns]

[StringerBellend]

2 hours ago, theseeker said:

By the way , I never insulted Sonar or for that matter Radar or anybody. I would call it " strongly disagreed".

And Cynth , I think you mean chardonnay socialist not champagne socialist. But then again you might be higher in the socialist caste system ! 

Craft beer socialism round here 

[StringerBellend]

2 hours ago, theseeker said:

By the way , I never insulted Sonar or for that matter Radar or anybody. I would call it " strongly disagreed".

And Cynth , I think you mean chardonnay socialist not champagne socialist. But then again you might be higher in the socialist caste system ! 

Is this the intellectual debate you were after @wendybr

if it is you should listen to more talk back radio 

or the Facebook comments on any news article 

 

Edited July 1, 2020 by StringerBellend

[Wanderboy]

2 hours ago, Carns said:

Forget the politics.

What a cracking episode that was!!

[Cynth]

3 hours ago, theseeker said:

By the way , I never insulted Sonar or for that matter Radar or anybody. I would call it " strongly disagreed".

And Cynth , I think you mean chardonnay socialist not champagne socialist. But then again you might be higher in the socialist caste system ! 

Is there a nice Shiraz socialist caste? Then count me in. 

[theseeker]

58 minutes ago, Cynth said:

Is there a nice Shiraz socialist caste? Then count me in. 

Of course there is. Shiraz is a " red" isn't it. Very appropriate for a socialist. 

Enjoy a glass or two.

 

[wendybr]

2 hours ago, StringerBellend said:

Is this the intellectual debate you were after @wendybr

if it is you should listen to more talk back radio 

or the Facebook comments on any news article 

 

It's not a bit of banter??  

[Legionista]

Buhuahua

[Legionista]

Haven’t met a dole bludger that isn’t a Labor voter.

[sonar]

1 hour ago, Legionista said:

Haven’t met a dole bludger that isn’t a Labor voter.

You travel in a very small circle

[sonar]

1 hour ago, Legionista said:

Haven’t met a dole bludger that isn’t a Labor voter.

[Legionista]

30 minutes ago, sonar said:

You travel in a very small circle

🥴

[StringerBellend]

5 hours ago, Legionista said:

Haven’t met a dole bludger that isn’t a Labor voter.

Who needs facts and figures when presented with such strong evidence

[mack]

7 hours ago, sonar said:

You travel in a very small circle

I'm surprised he didn't blame the Greens for it.

[wendybr]

11 hours ago, Legionista said:

Buhuahua

[Cynth]

16 hours ago, Legionista said:

Haven’t met a dole bludger that isn’t a Labor voter.

The words “dole bludger” says it all. 

[Legionista]

They’re out there. 

[StringerBellend]

8 hours ago, Cynth said:

The words “dole bludger” says it all. 

Chil cynth it’s just intellectual discussion and/or banter 
 

 

 

[theseeker]

1 hour ago, StringerBellend said:

Chil cynth it’s just intellectual discussion and/or banter 
 

 

 

The famous intellectual Confucius had a saying " If the systems got tits , somebody will milk it"

And when they are in government Labor provides plenty of tits. 

[sonar]

1 minute ago, theseeker said:

The famous intellectual Confucius had a saying " If the systems got tits , somebody will milk it"

And when they are in government Labor provides plenty of tits. 

....and the Libs supply all the ***nts

[sonar]

5 minutes ago, theseeker said:

The famous intellectual Confucius had a saying " If the systems got tits , somebody will milk it"

And when they are in government Labor provides plenty of tits. 

Like this effort from Mattias....

https://www.michaelwest.com.au/matthias-cormanns-23000-travel-bill-for-broome-trips-over-five-years/

[theseeker]

8 minutes ago, sonar said:

....and the Libs supply all the ***nts

Six letter word ending in " nts"  I can't figure it out.