Jump to content
  • Parramatta Stadium To Be Rebuilt!


    mack

    The NSW Government have announced long awaited plans to knock down and rebuild Parramatta Stadium, the home of the Western Sydney Wanderers.

     

    The 30,000 planned capacity is the culmination of the long-term stadium development strategy of the NSW Government, with the political lobbying and jockeying between Parramatta Stadium, the Sydney Football Stadium, ANZ Stadium and Penrith Stadium finally put to rest, at least in terms of the Western Sydney Wanderers.

     

    The first stadium to be built is a new Parramatta Stadium, with the existing stadium demolished to make way for a new 30,000 capacity stadium. A new stadium at Moore Park in the CBD will be between 50,000 and 55,000 seats, and it is likely that ANZ Stadium will be fully rectangularised and may have a retractable roof.

     

    Another potential long-term boom for either the Wanderers or the A-League itself, is a plan for a new stadium in Western Sydney perhaps at Penrith or Liverpool, both locations could provide for matches to be played by the Wanderers, or see the stadium as the home for a new A-League team.

     

    The new Parramatta Stadium is expected to be complete by early 2019 at a cost of approximately $300 million.

     

    I call upon the Wanderers, Football Federation Australia and the NSW Government to ensure that our club is not left out of discussions about the facilities and design at the venue, European style Safe Standing should be a priority at the new stadium to ensure a fully world class venue.

     

    While it is likely the naming rights will be up for sale, I also put forward that the new stadium be called Dino Park.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    marron

    Posted

    I don't know what stage it's at.

     

    Basically if you come up through Surry hills between Cleveland and foveaux streets and want to go as the crow flies to Moore park, instead of going up to the corner where the captain cook hotel is, or going around the boys and girls high schools, then, yes, I suppose it will. But it needn't have ccost that much surely...

     

    LEN023_MooreParkBridgeMap_v1.JPG

    wendybr

    Posted

    ^^^^Soooo it's just that structure marked in blue..... literally the overpass which is also a cycleway????  That's all???

     

    That surely can't be worth $38 million. No way!

    Prydzopolis

    Posted

     

    Footbridges in this context are warranted. The cost however...

     

    Yes... I want to catch sight of this $38 mill footbridge. It has boggled my mind.
    A bridge from central to the SCG would cost about that much, but surely the cost of a bridge spanning 6-7 lanes surely couldn't cost that much, $20m on a bridge? WTF?

     

    It doesn't surprise me in the slightest that they spent an extra $10m making aesthetic changes to make it less vulgar on the eyes then another $8m speeding up the construction process.

    Alexander

    Posted

    ^^^^Soooo it's just that structure marked in blue..... literally the overpass which is also a cycleway????  That's all???

     

    That surely can't be worth $38 million. No way!

    Hang on....are you saying that the so called wonder bridge we've been hearing about ONLY extends across ANZAC Parade???

    FCWanderers

    Posted

     

    ^^^^Soooo it's just that structure marked in blue..... literally the overpass which is also a cycleway????  That's all???

     

    That surely can't be worth $38 million. No way!

    Hang on....are you saying that the so called wonder bridge we've been hearing about ONLY extends across ANZAC Parade???

    I'm afraid so, here are a few links that contain photos and artists impressions of what was built.

     

    http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/unimpressed-world-cup-quarterfinal-cricket-fans-belt-albert-tibby-cotter-bridge-for-six-20150318-1m1y9i.html

     

    http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/projects/planning-principles/centre-for-urban-design/achievements/albert-tibby-cotter-walkway.html

     

    http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/albert-tibby-cotter-bridge-blowout-to-come-under-audit-scrutiny-20150417-1mnh1q.html

     

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/city-east/future-of-anzac-parade-obelisk-a-mystery-after-being-ripped-out-for-tibby-cotter-walkway/story-fngr8h22-1227379991367

    Wanderboy

    Posted (edited)

    Yes. The bridge is in place. It was hurriedly built so it would be ready in time for the Cricket World Cup last February.

    What I find weird about it is that it doesn't really link up with any paths/walkways that were existing.

    It was just plonked in that location in the middle of the park. It is neither the best nor most practical place for it to have been, unless they rework paths.

    Most people walking to the stadiums from the west come up Foveaux and Fitzroy street, then cross Anzac Parade at the Captain Cook Hotel/Moore Park Rd intersection. That's where it was needed.

    Edited by Wanderboy
    wendybr

    Posted

    Hmmmmmmm...

     

    Thanks for posting those, FCW!!

     

    We usually park in the grounds of Sydney Boys High going to games at Allianz. The walk is reasonably direct to the stadium from there -  via the pedestrian crossing outside the school.

     

    This bridge will be worth using once... to see whether it shortens  the trip to and from the stadium. If it doesn't, we won't use it.  

     

    The race to get back to the car for a long drive home means whichever means is the quickest is what will be used. The big loops, I guess, are there for cyclists?? wheelchairs and strollers...

     

    I still struggle to see how that structure cost $38 million- that price tag seems beyond absurd!!   :unknw:

    wendybr

    Posted

    Yes. The bridge is in place. It was hurriedly built so it would be ready in time for the Cricket World Cup last February.

    What I find weird about it is that it doesn't really link up with any paths/walkways that were existing.

    It was just plonked in that location in the middle of the park. It is neither the best nor most practical place for it to have been, unless they rework paths.

    Most people walking to the stadiums from the west come up Foveaux and Fitzroy street, then cross Anzac Parade at the Captain Cook Hotel/Moore Park Rd intersection. That's where it was needed.

     

    This is absolutely true.  But I guess those pedestrians will use it instead of the big crossing near the Captain Cook Hotel..... and that will be safer for them, and better for motorists trying to escape.

     

    Having said that, if the big loops mean it takes much longer to cross the road on the bridge compared to the usual, fairly direct route back to Central, I imagine pedestrians will go which ever way saves them time.

    marron

    Posted

    This bridge is exactly where I go, or more specifically, wwhere i want to go. It always annoys me that you can't go as the crow flies to clevo but have to go around the schools.

     

    So. This is the first time anyone ever spent 38 mill on me.... and I feel.... empty.

    wendybr

    Posted

    This bridge is exactly where I go, or more specifically, wwhere i want to go. It always annoys me that you can't go as the crow flies to clevo but have to go around the schools.

     

    So. This is the first time anyone ever spent 38 mill on me.... and I feel.... empty.

     

    Empty???

     

    Well that's gratitude for you!    :acute:

     

    Glad it works for someone.... hopefully it will work for ......er.... a lot more too!    :D

    Flytox

    Posted (edited)

    Hmmmmmmm...

     

    Thanks for posting those, FCW!!

     

    We usually park in the grounds of Sydney Boys High going to games at Allianz. The walk is reasonably direct to the stadium from there -  via the pedestrian crossing outside the school.

     

    This bridge will be worth using once... to see whether it shortens  the trip to and from the stadium. If it doesn't, we won't use it.  

     

    The race to get back to the car for a long drive home means whichever means is the quickest is what will be used. The big loops, I guess, are there for cyclists?? wheelchairs and strollers...

     

    I still struggle to see how that structure cost $38 million- that price tag seems beyond absurd!!   :unknw:

     

    I've checked the cost of a few long pedestrian bridges and they come out around $250k per metre which is dearer than this one but they had the difficulty of working over water and/or architectural roof systems.

     

    The spirals are required to minimise disruption to the park because any walkway has a maximum allowable slope set by Australian Standards.  From memory the maximum slope is 1 in 14.

     

    The location of the bridge is set to suit the new light rail station and its length is due to having to cross Anzac Parade, the trees that line it and the special busway..

    Edited by Flytox
    wendybr

    Posted

     

     The big loops, I guess, are there for cyclists?? wheelchairs and strollers...

     

    I still struggle to see how that structure cost $38 million- that price tag seems beyond absurd!!   :unknw:

     

    I've checked the cost of a few long pedestrian bridges and they come out around $250k per metre which is dearer than this one but they had the difficulty of working over water and/or architectural roof systems.

     

    The spirals are required to minimise disruption to the park because any walkway has a maximum allowable slope set by Australian Standards.  From memory the maximum slope is 1 in 14.

     

    The location of the bridge is set to suit the new light rail station and its length is due to having to cross Anzac Parade, the trees that line it and the special busway..

     

    $250k per metre - extraordinary!!

     

    Thanks for having a go at explaining this Flytox!

     

    It's good to know that the seemly odd location was chosen for a purpose!

    Stpeters

    Posted

    there was several reasons for the blow out; 
    1. they did some work for the lightrail at the same time

    2. idiots forgot to factor in the cost of steel (i kid you not) 
    3. All the rain last year saw the delivery time go over, which was meant to be completed in full before the cricket world cup. 

    Prydzopolis

    Posted

    there was several reasons for the blow out; 

    1. they did some work for the lightrail at the same time

    2. idiots forgot to factor in the cost of steel (i kid you not) 

    3. All the rain last year saw the delivery time go over, which was meant to be completed in full before the cricket world cup.

     

    $18m dollars worth of work? Work for light rail but how much work did they actually do? They didn't account for the cost of steel, just how?

     

    I think when it comes down to it, people aren't unhappy at the bridge but it's more so that they've blown so much money on such a small project. Ridiculously amateur hour, you just hope that this sort of planning isn't repeated with the stadiums :unknw:

    matty

    Posted

    Of course it will

    Stpeters

    Posted

    The bridge will only come into use when the derby is on and for us drinking at the bat and ball 

    Prydzopolis

    Posted

    The bridge will only come into use when the derby is on and for us drinking at the bat and ball

     

    I can see them funnelling us through the park to the bridge but isn't it a bit out of the way from where you guys are drinking?
    beatsurrender

    Posted (edited)

     

    there was several reasons for the blow out; 

    1. they did some work for the lightrail at the same time

    2. idiots forgot to factor in the cost of steel (i kid you not) 

    3. All the rain last year saw the delivery time go over, which was meant to be completed in full before the cricket world cup.

    $18m dollars worth of work? Work for light rail but how much work did they actually do? They didn't account for the cost of steel, just how?

     

    I think when it comes down to it, people aren't unhappy at the bridge but it's more so that they've blown so much money on such a small project. Ridiculously amateur hour, you just hope that this sort of planning isn't repeated with the stadiums :unknw:

     

     

    Wow, some builders just made a massive profit.

    Like a local primary school I know, got charged just under a million for a new toilet block, under the Rudd governments recession busting BER scheme!

    Edited by beatsurrender
    Prydzopolis

    Posted

    Like a local primary school I know, got charged just under a million for a new toilet block, under the Rudd governments recession busting BER scheme!

    I'd say that was more to do with how they decided the money was going to be spent, it is very well known that due to the high demand during that period & limited supply of builders that they were easily able to quote projects with a ridiculously high premium. The NSW government doesn't really have that excuse.

    Gazmon

    Posted

     

     

    there was several reasons for the blow out; 

    1. they did some work for the lightrail at the same time

    2. idiots forgot to factor in the cost of steel (i kid you not) 

    3. All the rain last year saw the delivery time go over, which was meant to be completed in full before the cricket world cup.

    $18m dollars worth of work? Work for light rail but how much work did they actually do? They didn't account for the cost of steel, just how?

     

    I think when it comes down to it, people aren't unhappy at the bridge but it's more so that they've blown so much money on such a small project. Ridiculously amateur hour, you just hope that this sort of planning isn't repeated with the stadiums :unknw:

     

     

    Wow, some builders just made a massive profit.

    Like a local primary school I know, got charged just under a million for a new toilet block, under the Rudd governments recession busting BER scheme!

     

     

    Yeah. Heard a few stories following the School BER scheme... local one near me for a $2 million dollar 'hall'... that was really just a large pergola over the basketball courts.

    thefairy

    Posted

    I worked on some of the BER stuff. Majority of the stuff is copy paste. Engineering wise it was peanuts, the contractors milked it.

    Just like every government scheme. People will find loopholes and abuse the system.

    theguyyouwishyouwere

    Posted

    I worked on some of the BER stuff. Majority of the stuff is copy paste. Engineering wise it was peanuts, the contractors milked it.

    Just like every government scheme. People will find loopholes and abuse the system.

     

    yep, and those same people rort the government complain about how every tax hike is unjustified.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...