Jump to content
  • Wanderers Into ACL Semi-Final On Away Goals!


    mack

    The Western Sydney Wanderers will face FC Seoul in the Asian Champions League Semi-Final after they progressed in the Quarter Final tie against Guangzhou Evergrande on the away goals rule.

     

    Following the 1-0 win in Parramatta, and despite the 2-1 loss on the night, an away goal to Tomi Juric gave Western Sydney victory in a nerve racking tie in China.

     

    Goalkeeper Ante Covic was the hero in the first half with his penalty save. Covic spared the blushes of Iacopo La Rocca who felled Elkeson in the penalty box with an utterly dreadful tackle reminiscent of the one by Lucas Neill against Italy in the World Cup in Germany. Gilardino stepped up to the spot only to be denied by Covic, his penalty was a poor one, almost straight down the middle but with no power or height he effectively hit the strike straight at the Wanderers number 1.

     

    The Wanderers were placed under immense pressure in the second half, but found their vital goal through a penalty of their own. The Evergrande defence were lulled into a false sense of security by Juric being in an offside position, it let Bridge stroll unopposed into the box and he was taken out in a woeful challenge by opposition keeper Zeng Cheng, who received the most red card worthy yellow card I've seen in years.

     

    Juric blasted his penalty to the right side netting to give his side a 1-0 lead on the night and a 2-0 lead on aggregate. Unfortunately for the Wanderers, it looked like the referee gave Juric his own yellow card for the post-goal celebration, and if so, Juric will miss the first leg against Seoul.

     

    The drama was far from over though as Guangzhou immediately pegged the Wanderers back when Diamanti, who was best player on the park for the ACL winners of last year, took advantage of a flick-on that left him wide open for a neat finish under the legs of Covic.

     

    Hearts in mouth time came halfway through the four minutes of stoppage as Guangzhou threatened a miracle escape by scoring their second on the night through Elkeson who had a tap-in at the back post after a goal-line scramble.

     

    The 120 seconds remaining seemed like an eternity, but stoic possession by the Wanderers kept the ball in their attacking half and several fouls later full time was blown, sending the Wanderers into the semi-final in their first appearance in the Asian Champions League via the majestic away goals rule.

     

    The win was the best loss in the history of the club, their progression into the semi-final has only been matched by Australian clubs once, with Adelaide United, who also managed to progress through to the final in the 2008 edition of the competition.

     

    The current ACL schedule, if followed, will see the Wanderers play FC Seoul in Korea in the first leg on the 17th of September, with the return leg on the 1st of October. There are rumours that the club will be playing a friendly tournament in the middle east but there has been no official confirmation as yet.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Was after the goal, so presumably excessive celebration. Santalab may have got one also, after he came on he (I think) chopped down a guangzhou player, but advantage was played and I think the ref came back later and carded him. La Rocca got a card as well I think.

    http://www.the-afc.com/en/acl-2014-schedule-n-results.html

     

    still hasnt updated match report with card details

    Cole, Juric and Bridge got cards. So Tomi and Shannon will miss the first leg.

    Link to comment

    Now that's what's called winning ugly! That second half , you could see the guys were out on their feet n surviving on pure guts n determination. How crap are the so called glamour team in Asia? Seriously? The only decent players they had were their imports , the rest were ordinary. I can't believe it, this story just keeps on going n getting better! **** this little fish in a big pond mentality, we're a big fish in a big f**king pond!!! Imagine if we had've been half way thru our season! Nothing to fear anymore, Asia is ours!!! As I'm writing this, "We are the champions" has come on the radio!!! Lol. **** YEAH WE ARE!!!! COYW!!!!

    Link to comment

    anyone know when our champions fly back in at mascot ??? would be nice for them to have a welcome home crew i reckon..

     

    I read somewhere they were heading to the Middle East for pre-season now?

    Link to comment

    Woke up this morning bleary eyed and realised it wasn't a dream, it did actually happen :D

     

    Anyone know where the team is off to next, some say straight off to the middle east for a pre season game or are they coming straight back in to Mascot later today?

    Link to comment

    Blood pressure went up and stress level was high all because of Cole. Appiah should not have started as he was leaving Cole all to defend on his own and sometime defending two players. Popa should have couple of well experienced players as subs. We were missing spira. Good that we have the first game away for the semis. 

    Link to comment

    That 'Pete in Cronulla' is being his usual, neanderthal best again in the comments section of the SMH. Seriously, is this guy a nut job?? Anything to do with the Wanderers and he's there being a goose and how the Wanderers are an embarrasment to Australian Football. Get a life you dickwad!

    Link to comment

    Was just reading the 442 forums (I know, kill me) and the amount of people who thought the Guangzhou 'keeper should have been sent off after the challenge against of Bridge, is too damn high!

     

    Brenton Speed included, it seems as is everyone has this idea of 'last man' when looking at the offence. The law states nothing about 'last man' and refers only to 'an obvious goal-scoring opportunity'. Bridge had knocked the ball in front, and then the 'keeper committed the foul. Had it had been the other way around, then yes, a send off, but as it stood the referee was 100% correct.

     

    Similar with the 'pass back' law too, also says nothing about 'passing the ball backwards... what if the 'keeper is in front of the defending player and it's passed to him? (end rant).

    Link to comment

    do we get to edit the squad we submitted in July or is that the final squad till the end of the competition?

     

    btw Saba has only played limited minutes, surely he will be starting in both semi's :)

    Link to comment

    'last man' has become a popular phrase because it's a no brainer, if the last man takes a player out, unless the ball is already in the stands, give the dog a red.

     

    I understand why people think in that manner, but there are so many other factors to take into account - but, yes, quite often 'last man' challenges should result in a send-off.

     

    But, one thing I am sick of hearing (off-topic... sorry) is when a player is on the ground and kicking the ball "Can't to that ref!"... ummm... in this type of football, yes you can. I know in some indoor comps it's not allowed, but still...

    Link to comment

     

     

    'last man' has become a popular phrase because it's a no brainer, if the last man takes a player out, unless the ball is already in the stands, give the dog a red.

    I understand why people think in that manner, but there are so many other factors to take into account - but, yes, quite often 'last man' challenges should result in a send-off.

     

    But, one thing I am sick of hearing (off-topic... sorry) is when a player is on the ground and kicking the ball "Can't to that ref!"... ummm... in this type of football, yes you can. I know in some indoor comps it's not allowed, but still...

    The bee in your bonnet is unusual today my friend :P you should be in celebration mode today! Not grumpy old man mode!

    Link to comment

    Was just reading the 442 forums (I know, kill me) and the amount of people who thought the Guangzhou 'keeper should have been sent off after the challenge against of Bridge, is too damn high!

     

    Brenton Speed included, it seems as is everyone has this idea of 'last man' when looking at the offence. The law states nothing about 'last man' and refers only to 'an obvious goal-scoring opportunity'. Bridge had knocked the ball in front, and then the 'keeper committed the foul. Had it had been the other way around, then yes, a send off, but as it stood the referee was 100% correct.

     

    Similar with the 'pass back' law too, also says nothing about 'passing the ball backwards... what if the 'keeper is in front of the defending player and it's passed to him? (end rant).

     

    I disagree mate.

     

    If Bridge didn't get fouled, there was an obvious goal scoring opportunity presenting itself. All he had to do was tap the ball into an empty net from 2 yards. The cover defenders got there to clear in the end, but Bridge was in behind them and in an obvious position to score if not for being fouled.

     

    I'm not bagging the ref, because he was absolutely brilliant. But I think he got the colour of that card wrong.

    Link to comment

    People are looking at it this way, if bridge wasn't tripped, would he get to the ball first? (Eventual tap in) or do the 2 GUANGZHOU players get there first?

    Link to comment



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...